On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 11:43:59 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:31:10 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> >
> > No. TRUE should definitely not be defined as !FALSE.
> > Booleans in C are a pain. Personally, I avoid using them entirely,
> as I
> > think they are more trouble than helpful, when they are not
> intrinsic
> > to the language.
>
> agreed - to me it's all 1's and 0's anyway :) bool is very artifical
> as it ends
> up an int one way or another :)
>
> > How about stdbool.h, i.e. bool/true/false? I don't have much
> experience
> > with the portability of this one, but it's at least standardized
> thing.
> >
> > Anyway, if nobody else is concerned, I'll just crawl back under my
> rock :)
>
> nice rock mate! :) now where did i put mine...
>
> *crawls back under his rock*
>
Everyone should obtain at least one such rock :)
In fact, this should be something available in that
e-catalogue of goodies - coffee mugs, t-shirts, mouse pads,
etc.. *and* a handy "e-rock" to crawl under :)
jose.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
