Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:27:42 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >> >>On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, David Sharp wrote: >> >> >>>On 9/24/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>><snip> >>> >>>>i'll opt for the "fuck you xwwidgets" option :) (nothing personal!) >>>>basically if an application/widget set cannot set the property correctly >>>>- we shoudl be free to happily entirely ignore it as corrupt/invalid :) >>> >>>i won't fight with you on that, i mostly agree. :D Was just throwing >>>that out as an idea. i suppose i could tell wxWidgets their doing >>>something wrong.. >> >>I know one of the wxwidgets dev very well. I'll tell him about that. >> >>Vincent > > > cool! fixes are good. as i said the "fuck you.." wasn't personal - it was > figurative. simply accetp valid data only and dont TRY" and fixup bad data - > otherwise developers dont realise they are generating bad data! :) > > The _NET_WM_ICON handling (ecore_x_netwm_icon_get) is still not ok. The property contains sets of (w, h, data[wxh]) items. The current code will work only if there is exactly one such item. Many apps provide multiple sets for icons of different sizes. ecore_x_netwm_icon_get should probably be rewritten to return an array of icons.
/Kim ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
