Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:28:20 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Ah well I guess I have to learn to use ctrl-alt x instead, or just keep >>a little patch for the default theme which reverts the reordering. menu >>order is a theme thing isn't it? > > > no - it's in the code :) > > Oh too bad. >>>personalyl i think re-ordering is for the better overall. >>> >> >>It's your baby so it's your decision although I still think it's the >>wrong one :), but you're probably right a significant part is the >>inconvenience it's causing me ;) > > > really i DO see bnoth sides to this argument, and both have merit. i just > think > this one leans more tothe "change the order" side of things. maybe in the long > term we could provide ways of having the menu re-ordered and customised. but > at > this stage i dont want to invest any time into this as there are MUCH bigger > fish to fry... like segfaulting e when windows are closed :) > Oh who told you about those ;), I'm recompiling with gcc-3.4 right now, so it might turn out to be a compiler bug, which is already fixed in newer gcc. That would put this witch to rest :)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
