On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:48:50 +0900 David Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi, > > I was reading about Autoconf and found this: > > <quote> > Previous versions of Autoconf promoted the name > `configure.in<http://configure.in>', > which is somewhat ambiguous (the tool needed to process this file is not > described by its extension), and introduces a slight confusion with ` > config.h.in <http://config.h.in>' and so on (for which `.in' means "to be > processed by configure"). Using `configure.ac <http://configure.ac>' is now > preferred. > </quote> > > ( > http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.57/html_mono/autoconf.html > ) > > On the other hand in the e-devel archives I found the following which seems > to suggest the opposite for "modern" autoconf versions. > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=enlightenment-devel&m=103860659115270&w=2 > > I'm thinking I should follow what the autoconf manual says and use > configure.ac <http://configure.ac> > Anyone care to comment? both are correct. we simply havent gone changing them all to be called configure.ac - what we do have does work and it's a royal paint ot trakc autofoo changes/breaks every few months so we just stay frozen in time and we likes it that way :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
