On Friday, 02 December 2005, at 14:58:58 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: > well too bad then. thats how it is. the fact is that the default > licenses didnt meet my needs/wants.
That's fine, but how do we know the extra language won't run into legal trouble like the early BSD license did? > there is no such thing as common law trademark last i checked. there > is common law copyright though. trademarks must be explicitly > redistered AND enforced. http://www.bitlaw.com/trademark/common.html This is US law, of course. I'm not sure about international law, but I'd bet there are similar provisions there too. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I have gotten into the habit of recording important meetings. One never knows when an inconvenient truth will fall between the cracks and vanish." -- Ambassador Londo Mollari, Babylon Five ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
