These are, I am afraid, both related to the slowness of sf.net. yes, XSM should be modified to do the uploads in the background - I never concieved that it would be used to publish directly to such a piss slow server!
A On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:45:26PM -0600, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > On 1/26/06, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 26 January 2006, at 22:08:27 (+0100), > > Jonathan Naumann - Toenda Software Development wrote: > > > > > i like the XSM too, but it's currently to slow. i think we should > > > use a drupal (or my toendaCMS ;) .. currently 0.7 ... hehe) or a > > > stytic page. > > > > They ARE static pages. Any speed problems you're seeing are almost > > certainly from SF.net, not XSM, and moving to another system wouldn't > > make things any better. > > > > He may be referring to the speed of updates and publishing, not loading > pages from SF. -- To iterate is human, to recurse divine. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
