On Friday, 27 January 2006, at 10:30:11 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: > well developer cvs works just fine on sf.net for us devs. sure svn > has features cvs doesnt hell - we dont use half the features of cvs > - leatalone svn. also i'm definitely one for "the devil you know" - > ie cvs has problems - but i know them and how to deal with them.
Exactly. > i know svn does things cvs doesnt and has fixed some things It also fails to fix some things. And it breaks some other things. > but i don't see a compelling reason to change to svn as such. Nor do I. Again, let's focus on the primary issue here and try to avoid getting sidetracked. I can understand the desire to lump lots of changes together, but anyone who's been in the business long enough knows that changing too many things at once will get you burned. We need to focus on solving the problem at hand. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Now they show you how detergents take out bloodstains, a pretty violent image there. I think if you've got a T-shirt with a bloodstain all over it, maybe laundry isn't your biggest problem. Maybe you should get rid of the body before you do the wash." -- Jerry Seinfeld ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
