> 
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > itray will die. after havign gone into the systray spec in
> > > detail - it's just incompatible with e17. itray as it stands
> > > will die.
> > >   
> > oh well.. sorry to hear it. i'll just have to make do with ibox,
> > ibar,calendar clock weather monitor pager screenshot eloquence
> > and slideshow ;) kinda running out of room for shit... heard you
> > were making a proposal for a new revision of the tray spec to
> > clean up the ambiguities and (i suppose) make it more compatible
> > with e17's goals.. how is it going?
> 
> well after some initial kafuffle - i formalised the proposal into
> more formal wording... and everything has gone silent. everyone
> left and stopped talking about it. i think there is a severe amount
> of apathy amongst some peolpe invovled in such "standards". unless
> they outright deny the proposal for good technical reasons (and i
> will accept good technical reasons any day - i'm a pragmatist -
> i'm proposing the improvements also based on good sound technical
> reasons), i will push ahead anyway and push it as an independant
> standard - freedesktop or not. if this kind of thing happens it
> demonstrates the "freedesktop" standards are really just a farce
> as they simply are a place for some particular players (who write
> the specs) to write down their ideas and claim it as a standard
> that everyone should follow. if things move and are discussed -
> then the system works. time will tell. but in the event it doesn't
> - then as far as i'm concerned the standard is a farce and any
> standard we propose as our own and simply docuemnt sufficiently is
> as valid as an other - so then it is up to users such as yourself
> to pressure application and toolkit authors to adopt better
> standards and use them without wating for pointless "standards
> bodies" to bless them. otherwise in the end you users are the meat
> in the sandwich and you lose out - you have to choose - the wm or
> DE u like - or the apps u like - one or the other, but not both.
> 

        It's likely that people would like a 'better' spec, and
would adopt one if it proved itself.. Going ahead with working
out your proposed spec in e might show others that it is indeed
a good candidate :)





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to