Hi, I've been going through our API documentation generation (for Eo API) and I found some interesting numbers. We all know there is a lot to do in terms of porting legacy to Eo API but I found a lot of API that is in Eo but is not in the Efl namespace (i.e. Ecore / Elm etc) which I assume will also need to be ported.
The total number of "legacy eo" classes and types are as follows (with percentage of total in each category) === CLASS SECTION: 442 === Classes: 157 (44%) Interfaces: 3 (3.5%) Mixins: 8 (24%) Events: 274 (48%) === TYPE SECTION: 807 === Aliases: 62 (85%) Structs: 46 (52%) Struct fields: 71 (35%) Enums: 92 (48%) Enum fields: 534 (40%) Or to summarise 43% of the Eo definitions are not in the Efl namespace. This is a lot of additional work to the new class creation - do we have tickets to track this all as well? Have a happy weekend! Andy -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel