On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Kolesa <dan...@octaforge.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 19:42, Davide Andreoli wrote:
[snip] >> Of course Eolian should help us to not make mistakes, but the real issue >> at this point is that there isn't a clear consensus of what the namespaces >> are and how they should be managed in bindings (that is the key point of >> this email) > > I don't really know what you mean by "there isn't a clear concensus"... this > has been discussed numerous times and as far as I know there isn't anything > left unsolved. Indeed. I had to modify C++ generation because it was consensus that allowing classes and namespaces to have the same name a good thing for C. [snip] Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
