On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Kolesa <dan...@octaforge.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 19:42, Davide Andreoli wrote:


>> Of course Eolian should help us to not make mistakes, but the real issue
>> at this point is that there isn't a clear consensus of what the namespaces
>> are and how they should be managed in bindings (that is the key point of
>> this email)
> I don't really know what you mean by "there isn't a clear concensus"... this 
> has been discussed numerous times and as far as I know there isn't anything 
> left unsolved.

Indeed. I had to modify C++ generation because it was consensus that
allowing classes and namespaces to have the same name a good thing for


Felipe Magno de Almeida

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
enlightenment-devel mailing list

Reply via email to