On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:53:43 -0300 Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira <[email protected]> said:
> Em seg., 2 de mar. de 2020 às 07:15, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 20:14:33 -0300 Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira > > <[email protected]> said: > > > > > What are E devs' thoughts on an E's runtime for FlatPak? > > > > are you volunteering? > > > > Yes, but I need to know what are other essential libs besides EFL and its > dependencies to make an “EFL SDK” and I'd like to know what you guys think > on the topic. you're going to find an afl runtime flatpak is going to have a lot of system lib deps... you will have to solve systemd support too :) now e will have some problems for you too. acpid needs to be run by root on the host... you might find you have to ship lots of xlibs and wayland libs in the efl runtime... e uses ptrace and contains setuid root utils to ensure it runs. sandboxing is going to be a problem. e will not work well sandboxed as it kind of expects to get a lot of access to /sys, /dev, /proc, and to the entire fs due to efm, and more. it'll want to bind to a few dbus services too so sanboxing dbus will be bad(tm). e has to fork and exec apps and more.... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - [email protected] _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
