Michael Jennings wrote: > On Monday, 11 September 2006, at 14:56:45 (-0400), > Christopher Michael wrote: > >> "Those who contribute to get-e refuse to contribute to >> > enlightenment.org, and that's their choice." >> >> This I totally have to disagree with. It's not that we refuse to >> contribute, far from it. It's just that enlightenment.org doesn't >> have an active maintainer for us to send content to. > > Sorry, DH, but this is simply not true, at least according to > HandyAndE. Whatever people may think of XSM, several people > apparently have access to update it and could accept submissions. > > Get-E started because those who were writing the documentation didn't > want to contribute it to E.org. I'm sure I could dig it up in my IRC > logs if I had several hours to kill. > > Michael > KX, ahh I see. I was unaware of the reasons that get-e started, but all that aside, Perhaps I should have rephrased my statement then:
"It's not that I refuse to contribute" :) Cheers, dh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
