On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:21:05 -0700 jose....@metztli.com said:

https://git.enlightenment.org/enlightenment/terminology/commit/262c66a3755457e27c1085b81972818fc89f9e08

:)

> Niltze [Hello]-
> 
> I usually have Terminology background(s) different from the 
> Enlightenment background(s). Evidently, the opacity slidebar adjusts the 
> Terminology transparency when the translucent box is checked; however, 
> if checked or unchecked the Terminology background *always* remains 
> mostly -- extremely -- opaque; accordingly, the background image 
> selected can barely be discerned.
> 
> Notwithstanding, replacing the v1.13.0 newer file (which has a couple of 
> extra lines of code) with the older file:
> terminology-1.12.1/data/themes/default/core.edc
> 
> before building Terminology v1.13.0, enables the image to be properly 
> seen by adjusting the opacity slidebar.
> 
> Just my personal experience, of course, but thank you for your work in 
> Terminology.
> 
> -- 
> Best Professional Regards.
> 
> --
> Jose R R
> http://metztli.it
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Metztli Reiser4: Debian Bookworm w/ Linux 5.17.12-3 AMD64
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> feats ZSTD compression https://sf.net/projects/metztli-reiser4/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Official current Reiser4 resources: https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com



_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to