On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:59:36 +0200 Jakob Haufe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> On 21.10.2006 03:57, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>>
>>> a lot os stuff there - and on an initial scan over them i'd  
>>> reject about
>>> 50% of what i see so far (cvs already fixed, weird version  
>>> changes, changes
>>> in /etc location that don't match up with how verbatim autofoo  
>>> end up
>>> installing the files,  ...)
>>
>> I suppose the version change you mention is the strange "1:" in the
>> enlightenment package. The problem is the version of e16 in the  
>> debian,
>> which has this "1:". So dpkg always thinks, that e17 is older than  
>> e16
>
> oh = hoorray for packaging stupidity. at no point in e's past  
> release history
> have we actually broken versions and not incremented a version  
> numerically from
> the previous one - there just is no need to use debian's epoch.
> fan-bloody-tastic. :(

I mentioned this a while ago.  The debian packages on edevelop.org  
have been setting the epoch version to 2:  for a long time now.

-Blake

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to