On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >.... > > The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable replacement > for ecore_desktop, do we stick this somewhere in libs (as efreet or > e_xdg, or whatever name) or do we cram it in to ecore? My vote is that > we stop bloating ecore in the name of a 'dependency freeze' and keep > proper separation of libraries. (Its all 'new code' that needs to be > verified and tested regardless of where we stick it). > > Let us know what you guys think. >
Indeed, i agree here. Better make it away from ecore, ecore already has too many (unrelated?) things inside. turran > rephorm > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
