On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:04:42 -0500 Christopher Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
i just like 4096 - it's my "standard buffer for anything big" like paths, exec lines, etc. etc. i don't see a problem with making it a #define BIG_BUFFER though i don't see us needing to change the buffer size any time soon :) > Hey all, > > While reading through E (wm) code, I noticed that in some places > PATH_MAX is used and in others 4096 is used (ie: char buf[4096])... > I undestand what path_max is/does and how it relates to different > systems...my question is Do we have a preference as to which ?? > > I don't mind doing the leg work on this to correct everything and get it > consistent. > > Cheers, > dh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
