Michael Jennings wrote: > On Sunday, 11 March 2007, at 15:53:28 (+0100), > St?phane Bauland wrote: > > >> Ok! In fact, ecore_proto is not an abstraction layer to im >> protocol. It needs to support all type of protocol (ie. im, ftp, >> http, sftp, etc...) So we dont need telepathy. >> > > Okay, first off, NO MORE ecore_* crap! Enough already! > > Second, please explain the rationale behind providing an "abstraction > layer" for completely orthogonal and unrelated protocols (like XMPP > and SFTP). > > Third, if we want to abstract protocols like HTTP, we use curl. We > don't create yet another crapstraction library. > > Michael > > Yeah! Maybe an eproto library separeted from ecore could be ok too, but raster said that he hopes to have a ecore_proto library so for the moment i build it under ecore. i will see that with raster after it'll be done.
I have show him my current code and it said "that's nice and generic" so i thought that what he wants. I need to more work on it for the moment (fix bugs, leaks). I need to see him when he will be back to speak with him about. See you, stephane Ps: Sorry for english, hardcore sunday.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
