Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Christopher Michael wrote: > >> Vincent Torri wrote: >>> I don't think that all the tests on _dpms_available are necessary. Your >>> program has to test it once, then do the necessary to not use the dpms >>> functions. > >> And if the calling program does not make those tests??? Segfault !!.. These >> are just simple int checks which are very fast todo and not expensive at >> all, >> plus give added safety to insure that dpms can be used before trying to make >> calls to it. >> >> I don't see the problem here.. > > It's not really a problem. Maybe just not the correct location for that > fix. For me you use the ecore_x_dpms_query as all the _init function you > can find in the efl. > > Also, it's the only location where such tests are done (see > ecore_x_(damage, fixes, etc...). > > So for me, the fix should be done in e17, not in ecore_x_dpms > > Vincent Perhaps...my thoughts were for use outside of E where someone may not make those checks...at least this way ecore (and potentially outside app) doesn't die a horrid death :)
dh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
