You fit into core. The core group is authors from e, evas, ecore, edje, eet,
embryo.

The groups should be less specific than ETK, EWL.  I feel the groups should
be Core, Libraries, Applications, Modules, Web.  Other than that, good
ideas.

On 6/17/07, Ravenlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well,
>
> Its been a few days.  The ML has been completely silent on this issue.
>
> I received quite a few comments on IRC, mostly positive.  I did have one
> or two people who did not like the proposal, but by the end of
> conversation they had come around.
>
> So... not really sure what to say here.  I was hoping there would be
> some good discussion on the ML so that I/we could definitively say we
> were either adopting some changed format or simply leaving it alone.
> Maybe I simply haven't waited long enough, and someone may still speak up.
>
> A couple of people have already gone ahead and changed their info files.
>   I think I will do the same (Its my proposal so of course *I* like the
> idea.).  The new format should be "backwards compatible" with the old
> with respect to any script that might be reading it, so maybe there is
> no harm done.
>
> Fwiw... since there has been no discussion of the group field... I am
> unsure what group I would belong to.  Using the old definition of
> "someone who is interested in contributing to E as a whole, not just one
> project/subsystem"  I feel I belong to the "Core" group.  If someone
> feels this is in error... please let me know, as I am interested in
> "where I fit in".
>
> -ravenlock
>
> On 06/14/2007 12:45, Ravenlock wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > (fwiw... while this is not particularly development related, its
> > developer comments I am interested in so I sent it to the Devel ML)
> >
> > There seems to be some disagreement on the intention of the fields in
> > the info.txt files.  This seems to be made worse by the fact that we are
>
> > now parsing these files for website content.  IMHO, I think parsing them
> > is a Good Thing (TM).
> >
> > So I'd like to open a discussion on format changes.  Here is what I am
> > thinking might be useful:
> >
> > Login:                CVS Login
> > IRC Nick:
> > Name:         <First> [[<Middle>] <Last>]
> > Location:
> > E-Mail:               [-]<e-mail address>
> > WWW:          URL
> > Managing:       If you can say "Damnit stop doing that!!! This is *MY*
> >               project!" List it here.  If you are the original
> >               author(s) of some subsystem of E, list it.
> > Contributing: If you have successfuly made changes to it.  Feel free
> >               to list it here.
> > Group:                Must be in one or more groups.
> > Platform:     Platform(s) you run E17 on.  Your *Preferred* one listed
> >               first please.
> >
> >
> > Notes:
> > 1) Anything with more than one item should be comma separated.
> > WWW, managing, contributing, platform, etc.
> >
> > 2) The hyphen which precedes the e-mail address should prevent it
> > from being posted by any scripts to any sites.  Useful for when
> > you do in fact desire for your e-mail to be available to folks...
> > just don't want it on the web site.
> >
> > 3) I think platform is a nice addition, as I frequently hear pple on IRC
>
> > asking if E works on this platform or that, or if it works well.  I
> > think it is nice to know who is running a similar platform as you so
> > that you might converse about issues specific to that platform.  I know
> > I would like a list of the FreeBSD users.  :)
> >
> > 4) Groups might be Core, EWL, ETK, Themes, WebSite, whatever we decide.
> >   Poeple *must* be in one or more groups.  This will help with
> dynamically
> > constructing the peoples page on the website.  Additionally, I have
> > always thought of the "Core" group as meaning "Senior devs with some
> > amount of authority over E17 as a whole".  That philosophy comes from my
>
> > FreeBSD associations.  So it may not in fact mean as much.  But, I am
> > wondering if we could actually create such a group.  I think it would be
> > useful for people (be them a "junior" developer like myself, or users of
>
> > E) when seeking help on an issue or possibly arbitration of some
> > disagreement.  So I wonder if those in such a group shouldn't be
> > appointed by raster, or agreed upon by the devs, or simply entered into
> > after so many days/months/years of service to E?  A valid set of groups
> > must be identified or it will not be possible to use this field for
> > dynamic web creation. Just thoughts.
> >
> > There also seems to be a group of contributors whom we would like to
> > give credit to, yet they do not have cvs access.  Might we setup one
> > directory to house info files for them in.  possibly just naming the
> > files IRCNick.txt and use the above format?  Then they could get parsed,
>
> > and put in the groups needed (if we use groups).
> >
> > Just some thoughts.  Hoping people will comment.  I have no idea if a
> > change is really needed... but seems like it could be good to discuss.
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ravenlock
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to