You fit into core. The core group is authors from e, evas, ecore, edje, eet, embryo.
The groups should be less specific than ETK, EWL. I feel the groups should be Core, Libraries, Applications, Modules, Web. Other than that, good ideas. On 6/17/07, Ravenlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, > > Its been a few days. The ML has been completely silent on this issue. > > I received quite a few comments on IRC, mostly positive. I did have one > or two people who did not like the proposal, but by the end of > conversation they had come around. > > So... not really sure what to say here. I was hoping there would be > some good discussion on the ML so that I/we could definitively say we > were either adopting some changed format or simply leaving it alone. > Maybe I simply haven't waited long enough, and someone may still speak up. > > A couple of people have already gone ahead and changed their info files. > I think I will do the same (Its my proposal so of course *I* like the > idea.). The new format should be "backwards compatible" with the old > with respect to any script that might be reading it, so maybe there is > no harm done. > > Fwiw... since there has been no discussion of the group field... I am > unsure what group I would belong to. Using the old definition of > "someone who is interested in contributing to E as a whole, not just one > project/subsystem" I feel I belong to the "Core" group. If someone > feels this is in error... please let me know, as I am interested in > "where I fit in". > > -ravenlock > > On 06/14/2007 12:45, Ravenlock wrote: > > Hello, > > > > (fwiw... while this is not particularly development related, its > > developer comments I am interested in so I sent it to the Devel ML) > > > > There seems to be some disagreement on the intention of the fields in > > the info.txt files. This seems to be made worse by the fact that we are > > > now parsing these files for website content. IMHO, I think parsing them > > is a Good Thing (TM). > > > > So I'd like to open a discussion on format changes. Here is what I am > > thinking might be useful: > > > > Login: CVS Login > > IRC Nick: > > Name: <First> [[<Middle>] <Last>] > > Location: > > E-Mail: [-]<e-mail address> > > WWW: URL > > Managing: If you can say "Damnit stop doing that!!! This is *MY* > > project!" List it here. If you are the original > > author(s) of some subsystem of E, list it. > > Contributing: If you have successfuly made changes to it. Feel free > > to list it here. > > Group: Must be in one or more groups. > > Platform: Platform(s) you run E17 on. Your *Preferred* one listed > > first please. > > > > > > Notes: > > 1) Anything with more than one item should be comma separated. > > WWW, managing, contributing, platform, etc. > > > > 2) The hyphen which precedes the e-mail address should prevent it > > from being posted by any scripts to any sites. Useful for when > > you do in fact desire for your e-mail to be available to folks... > > just don't want it on the web site. > > > > 3) I think platform is a nice addition, as I frequently hear pple on IRC > > > asking if E works on this platform or that, or if it works well. I > > think it is nice to know who is running a similar platform as you so > > that you might converse about issues specific to that platform. I know > > I would like a list of the FreeBSD users. :) > > > > 4) Groups might be Core, EWL, ETK, Themes, WebSite, whatever we decide. > > Poeple *must* be in one or more groups. This will help with > dynamically > > constructing the peoples page on the website. Additionally, I have > > always thought of the "Core" group as meaning "Senior devs with some > > amount of authority over E17 as a whole". That philosophy comes from my > > > FreeBSD associations. So it may not in fact mean as much. But, I am > > wondering if we could actually create such a group. I think it would be > > useful for people (be them a "junior" developer like myself, or users of > > > E) when seeking help on an issue or possibly arbitration of some > > disagreement. So I wonder if those in such a group shouldn't be > > appointed by raster, or agreed upon by the devs, or simply entered into > > after so many days/months/years of service to E? A valid set of groups > > must be identified or it will not be possible to use this field for > > dynamic web creation. Just thoughts. > > > > There also seems to be a group of contributors whom we would like to > > give credit to, yet they do not have cvs access. Might we setup one > > directory to house info files for them in. possibly just naming the > > files IRCNick.txt and use the above format? Then they could get parsed, > > > and put in the groups needed (if we use groups). > > > > Just some thoughts. Hoping people will comment. I have no idea if a > > change is really needed... but seems like it could be good to discuss. > > > > > -- > Regards, > Ravenlock > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel