Ok. Feeling a bit stupid... But, I'm convinced. After all, i just wanted a
few arguments. :-)

2007/7/8, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
> module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
> This way we wouldn't have a long list, we instead have the modules more
> organised in category lists.
> It would be also cool to have the description directly in the
> module.desktop, this way the module doesn't need to get loaded for
> simply checking what the module does (with the about button).
>
> Greets,
> Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy
>
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:57:51PM -0500, Brian Mattern wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:40:37AM +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> > > On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and
> its not
> > > > only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is actually not a very bad idea, its actually a good move towards
> > > refactoring a lot of E's code and making it cleaner (if this continues
> > > with all the non-WM stuff in E that is).
> > >
> > > The only annoyance I can see here is having to load those modules
> > > yourself - which might be a bit of a problem to the clueless new user.
> >
> > I think they're on by default. Its just that there is no code to turn
> > them on for old configs (nor should there be).
> >
> > >
> > > I personally do advocate the idea though. The more important thing is
> > > to continue on doing this.
> >
> > I agree. Pushing functionality into modules has a side effect of forcing
> > the interfaces to be abstracted and (hopefully) cleaner.
> >
> > > E has become a BIG beast with a lot of
> > > features that are not required by a WM. What WM has so much
> > > configuration dialogs? X configs? Includes its own panels,
> > > mini-modules?  File manager?
> > >
> > > After thinking about the state of E (the WM / desktop shell first, and
> > > the entire EFL second), I believe that this is exactly what we need.
> > > We need to do this for everything that does not belong to the core WM.
> > > Things need to be moved out of the main code base and refactored.
> > >
> > > I even believe that we need to do this sort of thing for the "desktop"
> > > itself. E draws its own desktop, completely ignoring X's root window.
> > > Ignoring the root window itself is not a problem, but I firmly believe
> > > that we need to move the entire "canvas desktop" idea outside E. Call
> > > it e_desktop or whatever. E, as a WM, should not have to draw this
> > > desktop, handle the clock, battery, ibar, etc. and the rest of the
> > > modules that load and draw on the desktop. By putting this into E, not
> > > only have we made it bigger and slower, we have also made it more
> > > error and crash prone.
> > >
> > > The e_desktop application could, if need be, open up the space for
> > > modules like the ones we currently have. There is no reason for them
> > > to be a part of E itself. Now one would argue that some of those
> > > modules do in fact need access to some of the info that E has (ibox,
> > > drop shadow, pager?) but I am sure that we can find a sane way to do
> > > this stuff as well (I have not given those modules any thought as of
> > > now).
> > >
> > > Another part of E that really needs to move outside its code base is
> > > EFM. EFM is growing and becoming a terrifying beast. Anyone that has
> > > tried to fix something or add something to it knows that (ask me, I
> > > spent two hours understanding its code trying to add a feature the
> > > other day). Not only does EFM have its own process now, it keeps on
> > > growing and growing, and it still has a good way to go. We need to
> > > move EFM outside E and turn it into a standalone proper file manager.
> > > At that point,  E can *use* EFM for its file dialog needs, and having
> > > a file manager inside E as an excuse to needing a file selector /
> > > dialog for some internal things (background choosing, theme choosing
> > > etc) will no longer be a valid excuse to code a full fledged file
> > > manager inside E.
> >
> > Much of how the three components (wm, fm, desktop) interact would need
> > to be re-thought. The IPC interfaces would need a LOT of work.  That
> > said, the filemanager already does the majority of its work in a helper
> > application. Anyway, I would like to hear from raster about the reasons
> > behind mashing all of this functionality into one monolithic process
> > before giving any more though to how it could be split up. :)
> >
> > >
> > > Another component that should also be removed from E itself (maybe
> > > even completely deleted and replaced with an already existing library,
> > > or appended to that library) is e_thumb. e_thumb has no place inside E
> > > itself. We have Epsilon, a perfectly working library that can work
> > > both in "library mode" and in IPC mode as a service. If Epsilon has
> > > given some of us some trouble then we should fix it and use it instead
> > > of implementing a thumbnailer in E itself.
> > >
> >
> > I never did understand why epsilon was ignored. I know this was brought
> > up at least on IRC years ago. The 'no deps' requirement here just
> > resulted in much of the code in epsilon being rewritten inside e.
> >
> > I'll leave the rest of this email for later (gotta run).
> >
> > rephorm.
> >
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>



-- 
Luchezar P. Petkov
http://luchko.wordpress.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to