El Sunday 09 September 2007 11:36:53 Andreas Volz escribió:
> Not bad. But the current design is also not bad. If I remember correct
> the E website engine is very flexible. Perhaps you're able to create a
> changeable stylesheet. Many websites have this.
Nah, I don't think is worth it, I made another design because I don't like 
several decisions made with the current one, like using tables for laying out 
options that break when slightly bigger fonts are used or putting a BIG piece 
of the logo (with no function) occupying like 50% of the screen, etc.

But rather than having a lengthy discussion about this I prefer to present my 
perspectives with my alternative "don't decorate, communicate, focus on 
content, buzzword compliant 2.0" style that it's up to the developers to 
follow or not.

> But I think more important than style is content! The current content
> is... hm... "a bit raw in some parts". Perhaps you better spend time
> into improving the website content. :-?
>
I disagree, if I was a new user and went into the main page of the official 
website I would have a hard time finding the great (and updated!) articles 
about EWL hosted in the wiki.

Bad or disorganized design nullifies good contents almost completely (I'm not 
calling the current design bad or disorganized, this is a general statement).

Besides, as I said in my first mail, I do have some suggestions for content 
layout that could be applied regardless of the chosen design and I'm writting 
content as I can, look Z_en_coder up in the wiki.
I'm just worried about most users not knowing my articles in the wiki even 
exist.

But I'm writting content, for example, I'm currently half-way (in my local 
mirror of the wiki) to a comprehensive application development with Edje 
article, including not only standard EDC code and C API, but an introduction 
to evas, ecore, ecore_evas and how they relate to edje, the python and ruby 
APIs and the ruby based Redact compiler (+ Corrected versions of all code 
examples I happen to come across while studying this).

But as I said, its the developer's call, if they are interested in using a 
design like this I can work on it further and implement it once we are all 
satisfied, or I can just continue to write wiki articles.

> > right menu:
> > http://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ewebrightwt0.png
>
> I don't like this. There's no visual line between menu end and text
> start.
>
> regards
> Andreas
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to