On Nov 6, 2007 5:13 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats the whole point :). We would need to have an equivalent of > 'linus's tree' which we could consider to be the publishing branch. > Just a matter of having somebody high up there do it. But, it is a > responsibility because that person is responsible for pulling > worthwhile patches from other branches which is a fairly significant > responsibility (and perhaps time commitment); hopefully you or > whomever else is okay with that.
This responsability could be "distributed": the maintainter could pull from a few subprojects maintainers, which would incorporate contributions from others. And, of course, since everyone has a repo, if someone disappear for a while he could pull from someone else and go on. A more subtle question is how we are could split the CVS? There is a "natural split" of the CVS repo in staff.get-e.org, having ecore, evas, edje all in different repos. So the "main branch" is actually a collection of repos, and the "main branch maintainer" would mantain this set of repos. More separated libs like Etk and Ewl could have different maintainers. Cheers, Caio Marcelo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
