On Nov 6, 2007 5:13 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats the whole point :).  We would need to have an equivalent of
> 'linus's tree' which we could consider to be the publishing branch.
> Just a matter of having somebody high up there do it.  But, it is a
> responsibility because that person is responsible for pulling
> worthwhile patches from other branches which is a fairly significant
> responsibility (and perhaps time commitment); hopefully you or
> whomever else is okay with that.

This responsability could be "distributed": the maintainter could pull
from a few subprojects maintainers, which would incorporate
contributions from others. And,
of course, since everyone has a repo, if someone disappear for a while he could
pull from someone else and go on.

A more subtle question is how we are could split the CVS? There is a
"natural split"
of the CVS repo in staff.get-e.org, having ecore, evas, edje all in
different repos. So
the "main branch" is actually a collection of repos, and the "main
branch maintainer"
would mantain this set of repos. More separated libs like Etk and Ewl could have
different maintainers.


Cheers,
  Caio Marcelo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to