ecore_con should be removed from ecore. Other then that it looks good. dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 10:46 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote: > Hi, as the "ecore split" topic is around the ml again, after talking > to dj2 on irc there was a crucial point to decide what should stay and > what should be split and that's what "core" means. i agree different > people can have different views of what "core" means. So here is a > list of all ecore subsystems and in my opinion what should be moved. > Please fill this poll with your own comments so we can have a > consensus :) > > I = inside ecore > O = outside ecore > > ecore I > ecore_data I > ecore_con I > ecore_config O > ecore_desktop (wasnt it deprecated by efreet?) > ecore_directfb O > ecore_evas O > ecore_fb O > ecore_file I > ecore_ipc O > ecore_job I > ecore_sdl O > ecore_txt I > ecore_win32 O > ecore_x O > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
