Hi,

On Nov 24, 2007 10:22 AM, Enlightenment CVS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No need to have both unref and close, only creates ambiguity.
>
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/e/e17/libs/e_dbus/src/lib/dbus/E_DBus.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -3 -r1.4 -r1.5
> --- E_DBus.h    6 Nov 2007 23:58:56 -0000       1.4
> +++ E_DBus.h    24 Nov 2007 13:22:03 -0000      1.5
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@
>     EAPI E_DBus_Connection *e_dbus_bus_get(DBusBusType type);
>
>     EAPI void e_dbus_connection_ref(E_DBus_Connection *conn);
> -   EAPI void e_dbus_connection_unref(E_DBus_Connection *conn);
>
>     EAPI E_DBus_Connection *e_dbus_connection_setup(DBusConnection *conn);
>     EAPI void e_dbus_connection_close(E_DBus_Connection *conn);
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/e/e17/libs/e_dbus/src/lib/dbus/e_dbus.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -3 -r1.3 -r1.4
> --- e_dbus.c    17 Nov 2007 03:26:08 -0000      1.3
> +++ e_dbus.c    24 Nov 2007 13:22:03 -0000      1.4
> @@ -517,6 +517,8 @@
>  {
>    DEBUG(5, "e_dbus_connection_close\n");
>
> +  if (--(conn->refcount) != 0) return;
> +
>    dbus_connection_free_data_slot(&connection_slot);
>    dbus_connection_remove_filter(conn->conn, e_dbus_filter, NULL);
>    dbus_connection_set_watch_functions (conn->conn,
> @@ -543,13 +545,6 @@
>  e_dbus_connection_ref(E_DBus_Connection *conn)
>  {
>    conn->refcount++;
> -}
> -
> -EAPI void
> -e_dbus_connection_unref(E_DBus_Connection *conn)
> -{
> -  if (!conn) return;
> -  if (--(conn->refcount) == 0) e_dbus_connection_close(conn);
>  }

I don't like this. Why should we have only _ref() and not _unref()?
There's no ambiguity with _close() and _unref(), IMHO.

Regards,

-- Ulisses

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to