On Tuesday, 27 November 2007, at 23:01:26 (+0100), Vincent Torri wrote: > raster did that for me, for the Windows port of edje. snprintf on > Windows behaves differently.
Then Windows is wrong. That said, the correct course of action (IMHO), besides filing a bug against VC/VStudio, is to insert our own snprintf in between EFL and MS libc. Perhaps ecore needs a libast-like layer of compatibility functions. Unless the gcc optimizer is newly smart enough to remove redundant zeroing across a function call return.... Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Many things in life are highly overrated. Chief among them is love. No matter what anyone else tells you, nice guys do finish last. -- Rules of Life #96 and #97 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
