On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Saturday, 01 December 2007, at 10:39:49 (+0100), > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> Albin Tonnerre (aka Lutin) requested configure scripts to fail when >> an option is requested with --enable-*, but the dependancies are not >> met. >> >> Albin wrote a patch for that behavior. It's attached. >> >> basically, it replaces want_foo="yes" by want_foo="auto" when needed >> and check if that variable is changed or not when --enable-foo is >> passed to configure. if --enable-strict is passed to configure, the >> dependancy is not met and want_foo == yes, then AC_MSG_ERROR is >> called. > > Albin and I discussed it when he first posted it. When I read it > through the first time, I thought it would break certain things. > Turns out I had just misread the patch. > > It looks fine to me. The default behavior is still the same > (auto-detect), which is really the most important part, IMHO. > > I'd say go for it. If anyone had a strong objection, they've had > several days (since Albin's original post) to voice them. It's commited. Only change : I removed "Error: " in the error messages as configure already adds an "error: ". Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
