lok wrote: > It's not a bug the configure.in are set up this way in most (all?) modules. > They will be installed in `enlightenment-config --module-dir`. > Unless you use the --enable-homedir-install option. > Morlenxus pointed me than the --prefix was ignored, and I thought that it > might be a handful option for package maintainers (or people with > various reasons).
I think package maintainers would like modules to install in a location where e finds it, so I don't really think we should use --prefix. At least since modules don't use --prefix like normal apps do. For most users it isn't logical that ./configure --prefix=/usr in 'e_modules' wont work with ./configure --prefix=/usr in 'e'. Maybe a --set-module-installation-dir option? Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
