Hi, > Currently I know 2 projects of network manager: > - my project: Exalt, based on the elf (ecore_loop ...), the project > contains a daemon, a front end and 2 libraries > - the project of Stefan Schmidt, a front end for networkmanager based > on e_nm [...] > What do you think about these 2 projects ? Continue working on exalt is > a good idea or a waste of time ?
Short answer: keep going with exalt Long answer: - e_nm and exalt don't provide the same features. - on my box, exalt is working well, but Networkmanager is not. - Networkmanager is not standardized yet and comes from gtk2/gnome world. Do we really need this dependency ? - there is no other alternative to Networkmanager. - We like efl, coding on efl. No ? - We already have ewl/etk, weather/forecast, bling/blang/ecomorph, etc: don't worry about similar features. - exalt is a nice piece of code showing what we can do with only efl. But most important, don't forget the fun and do something you like! -- Jerome Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
