On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Kim Woelders wrote:
> Michael Jennings wrote: >> On Tuesday, 26 February 2008, at 20:27:44 (+0100), >> Kim Woelders wrote: >> >>> Would adding AC_DISABLE_STATIC in configure.in accomplish the same thing >>> without having to change every single Makefile.am? >> >> No, as that would disable static *libraries* as opposed to just static >> *modules*. The latter are useless, but the former aren't. :) >> > Aahh, yes of course, we are after all building a library here. > But how many libraries are actually built? Assuming not many - maybe it > would be easier (if possible) to revert the logic and add > --tag=enable-static where needed in stead? indeed, that would work too. question: should I revert what I did and use that logic ? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
