imho, it should stay, as it provides a nice abstraction layer for storing configuration ( with the possibility of using a unified tool to edit the binary config files later ). I am personally using it for the edje-viewer, and it was dead easy to implement.
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 23:28 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey, > > I'm writing a small app, and i would like to store its configuration. So I > thought about ecore_config. > > But, Peter told me that it's rarely used. Also, for example, ewl has it's > own config stuff, like e17. It seems that we are reinventing the wheel > very often :/ > > So my question is: is ecore_config dying and will it be removed soon ? Or > is it good enough to be used ? > > thank you > > Vincent > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
