On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Lars Munch wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Unfortunately the addition off expedite_check_engine.m4 in expedite > > broke the detection of the framebuffer engine in expedite. The course of > > this is an inconsistent naming of the file "evas-framebuffer.pc.in" > > which should be named "evas-fb.pc.in" to be consistent with the other > > engine names. > > can't we just modify what is checked in expedite ? That is configure.in, a > Makefile.am and 1 or 2 files. consistency does make sense :) > > The attached patch renames this file an changes Configure.in and > > Makefile.am in ecore and evas accordingly. > > > > A quick grep in the cvs repository indicates that expedite is the only > > project that actually uses evas-framebuffer.pc, so the breakage of > > applying this patch should be minimal. > > > > Regards > > Lars Munch > > > > > > -- > > Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner > > pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de > > suspect n'a été trouvé. > > Message délivré par le serveur de messagerie de l'Université d'Evry. > > > > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
