Hi Dariusz, Thanks for the bug report on this issue. I'll take a closer look at this and see about getting a fix in the next couple days, but feel free to submit a patch before I get to it.
Thanks, Nathan 2008/4/28 Dariusz Knociński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > I found memory leak in procedure ewl_image_rotate, procedures > ewl_image_rotate_90 and > ewl_image_rotate_180 have malloc for new image data but not have free for > old image data. > Regards > -- > Dariusz Knociński > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
