On Tue, 20 May 2008 21:19:43 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:18 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > then u'd have a platform that does NOT do 2's compliment math. not compiler > > but cpu... and i'd love to see that exist - NOT. :) everything is 2's > > compliment and so a 1 bit signed bitfield when "on" is "-1" which as you say > > yes, this makes sense. > > > > - still is > > true. it always will be :) > > but as kwo told, -1 != 1, so depends on how you check for true :-/ yup. this is the catch. u can do "is true or not" tests, but equality tests may or may not have the desired effect :) as you stated below! :) > usually boolean operations will work, but direct comparison will > not.... but yes, i have not seen any == 1 or != 1 in e, so it's bit > pointless. > > -- > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > http://profusion.mobi embedded systems > -------------------------------------- > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: gsbarbieri > Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
