On Mon, 26 May 2008 17:13:43 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
the real problem is struct hostent... imho we should virtualise this into our own struct for compatibility or remove the dns lookup call. i know we have the guards there now, but it isn't pretty. does anyone actually use this call (*as it's not strictly needed as ecore_con does the dns lookup async for you in the background anyway when connecting...)? > Hey, > > I have added guards around the inclusion of netdb.h in Ecore_Con.h > > That implies that for all projects that uses Ecore_Con.h, netdb.h must be > checks by AC_CHECK_HEADERS (or just define HAVE_NETDB_H when compiling the > program / library) > > In one hand, it is safer to check netdb.h, on the other hand, I find ugly > to have such guards in Ecore_Con.h > > What do you think it is the best ? removing thos guards, or keeping them ? > > Vincent > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
