On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:16:17 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "We" do not own anything because "we" are not a legal entity. So > there is no such thing as "our" code. There is raster's code, and > there's devilhorns' code, and there's your code...but there's no > "our" code. Which is precisely why any change is a wasted effort. There is an email circulating asking all known authors of EFL their opinion on changing the license. The CC list is massive, so much so that my email server refused to send my reply and I had to trim out some addresses. Even then I got 10 bounces due to email addresses no longer existing. To change the license we need a unanimous decision by every author. That is very likely not possible. There may or may not be any gains in changing, but I doubt the gains will be worth the huge effort. The effort is very likely to fail anyway. Can we get back to coding now?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
