Quoting David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:22:29 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > I know :), I thought we are talking about the core-libs, of course, >> > I hope that ewl will stay under the BSD license. >> >> There is no reason that all the libs / apps move to another licence. > > Actually there is a very good reason not to change license. Any such > change requires the agreement of ALL authors.
it's not a *reason* not to change, even not to try (if it's good to change the licence) > The recent mail out to > EFL authors proves that some will not agree, and that some are not even > contactable. Getting ALL authors to agree to a license change will be > impossible. why "impossible" ? Do you know what all other people on earth, for each libraries, have in mind ? Anyway, if some don't want another licence for a lib, we just keep it. But it's anyway good to know their choice and motivations for a licence or another. Vincent ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
