On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:05:33 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:19 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > and i want to put in other cvs modules: > > misc/ -> misc/ > > eterm/ -> old/eterm/ > > web/www -> www/ > > e16/ -> old/e16/ > > e_modules/ -> apps/e_modules > > Since both Eterm and e16 are actively maintained and use some of the > libs under libs, wouldn't it make sense for them to be under apps? > There are still plenty of users for them and placing them under old > seems like tagging them for near-term deprecation to me. well - eterm is pretty much static. it does get the odd commit. e16 - yes. active, but it is the predecessor to e17 and i'd like to move things into an according place. something dead/old should go there - including old libs and apps that are basically dead or non-actively worked on. > If you want them under another directory, then stable makes more sense > to me since they are the current stable release and do maintain > stability across releases. doesn't much matter - but i'd like to group them together. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
