On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:41:52 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:16 +0200 "Kim Woelders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300), > > > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > > > ... > > >> 2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them > > >> altogether? > > > > > > Subversion supports both. Personally I like the files way better > > > than the propset way, so I'd vote to keep it. > > > > > I have about 5 minutes of experience with svn so I might got it > > wrong but it looks to me like svn does not support .cvsignore and > > that the .cvsignore files have been converted to props in the > > cvs->svn conversion process. > > > > If that is correct we might as well remove the .cvsignore's. If not > > I'd like to know how to configure svn to use the .cvsignore files. > > > > it supports both - on IMPORT svn also set the properties for ignore > based on .cvsignore files... it kept the .cvsignore files (as i told > it to) :) > My vote is to keep them. B-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
