Arnaud de Turckheim schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Arnaud de Turckheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Enlightenment SVN schrieb:
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +# define INIT_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_init_ssl(svr)
>>>> +# define SHUTDOWN_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_shutdown_ssl(svr)
>>>> +# define FREE_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_free_ssl(svr)
>>>> +# define UNSET_SSL(svr) \
>>>> + do { \
>>>> + svr->ssl = NULL; \
>>>> + svr->ssl_ctx = NULL; \
>>>> + } while (0);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The point of using do {} while(0) in macros, fades away if you append a
>>> semicolon.
>>>
>> I'll remove the semicolon, sorry about that.
>>
No problem.
>>
>>>> +#else
>>>> +# define INIT_SSL(svr) 0
>>>> +# define SHUTDOWN_SSL(svr) 0
>>>> +# define FREE_SSL(svr) 0
>>>> #endi
>>>>
>>> I haven't read the full code, but I think you are missing the
>>> UNSET_SSL() for the !OPENSSL case.
>>>
>> We don't need UNSET_SSL() to be define when !USE_OPENSSL.
>> INIT_SSL, SHUTDOWN_SSL and FREE_SSL have to be define to 0 because these
>> macros are used in if tests.
>>
>>
> Hmmm... Sorry we definitively need to define UNSET_SSL()...
>
Yeah, I wasn't sure either, else I probably fixed it myself.
Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
