On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And btw, why would one be so foolish, when implementing the size-load-opts > down-scaling for jpgs, that they would simply software down-scale all the way > from the src size down to the load-opt size? Why would they not do just what > you're suggesting people do themselves - find the nearest power-of-2 fraction, > jpg-downscale to that, and then software down-scale the rest of the way? :)
Jose, all these 3 huge mails from you resume into a single api change: add a force flag to parameters, that's it. This last mail that request users to do power-of-2 on their side is as bad as you say it's to create a temporary canvas, it requires too much knowledge on user size, in this case require user to know about JPEG properties. PS: try to sent one single mail with all contents, the more "compressed" the better, it's hard to keep up with tons of mail with huge replies to themselves. Often I just lack motivation to finish reading your mails, I need to postpone reading to sometime I have more free time and I really loose lots of time trying to find the useful bits among all of them (there is always good stuff). Regards, -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
