On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:59 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:03:18 +0100 "Hendrik Siedelmann"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> 2008/12/3 The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:02:54 +0100 "Hendrik Siedelmann"
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>> >
>> >> 2008/11/30 The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:27:35 +0100 "Hendrik Siedelmann"
>> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> while fooling around with elementary trying to write some widgets I
>> >> >> found a pretty huge limitation in edje.
>> >> >> I was writing a page flip widget to be used for example for slideshow,
>> >> >> document viewer but also for page switching using cursor/finger on
>> >> >> touchscreen. But there seems to be no way to interaktiv set the
>> >> >> transition between two states in edje. For example I want to blend
>> >> >> between two parts depending on how far the cursor moved while pressed
>> >> >> down. This way mouse gestures would get visualised by a preview of
>> >> >> what would happen. But there I found no way to do this in edje one can
>> >> >> only do the full transition...
>> >> >
>> >> > for this - you need to use embryo script {}... it is possible - with a
>> >> > bit of thought and complexity and custom states :)
>> >>
>> >> Do you mean set_tween_state? Is there a reason this is not available
>> >> over the c interface?
>> >
>> > beacuse this is meant to be abstracted - c shouldnt be playing with stats
>> > of
>> > parts directly. you can talk to the edje via messages - these are used in
>> > many places in e and efl to abstract apis between edje and c code.
>>
>> But whenever edje is used inside a program the program code and the
>> edje code depend on each other anyway. Most programmers (me included)
>> choose a programming language for reasons. Forcing them to learn and
>> use embryo for some parts is propably not the best approach.
>
> edje is meant to abstract this so it can be replaced with some other design
> and
> setup that does something different - and the designer chooses this in the
> edje :)
yep, Hendrik, you're abusing edje and then complaining it doesn't
behave. As you said, you choose your language and you can keep using
it, just design your animation using it (hint: create your smart
object, swallow it in your edje, possible using edje for your smart
children... that is: edjes as parent and children of your smart).
depending on what you want, this can be a bit easier... if you can fit
into the "box" (sequence of items) model, then you can just implement
one function and register that function with edje, then you feed it
parameters using layout data (void*).
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
