On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:15:25 +1030 "Graham Gower" <graham.go...@gmail.com>
babbled:

> 2009/1/8 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi>:
> >
> > I really dislike such governor option for the same reason Matthew
> > Garrett: the faster you finish the task, the less power you use, less
> > time with hot cpu... even less time hd spinning (for io+cpu bound
> > tasks, like compile).
> 
> That's entirely the point though.
> Scale up cpu freq when the system is under higher cpu load, scale it
> down when its not.

i would agree here - ubuntu's policy is wrong - it's a bad idea. e's policy of
"drop applications down priority from e" is very effective when cpu is limited.
e (the overall desktop control mechanism) remains much mroe responsive and
usable even if apps it launches run off and eat cpu. this is especially
noticeable on embedded systems where processing power is at a premium. while
the process starts e becomes very sluggish until the process is up (and idle
again). thus nicing sub-processes makes this problem disappear. in the end you
want your primary "desktop controls" to be as responsive as possible no matter
what apps do. so this falls in line with that. as such we cant make e higher
priority as you need to be root to do that - but we can lower things e runs.

ubuntu's policy basically works against this. so as such i think i'll just have
it turn this off in e. it probably should be anyway.

n.b. - i didn't notice this as i use "low power automatic" (conservative)
governor - it doesnt clock up as much as automatic does - but it will for
sustained cpu needs.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to