> This is something I liked to ask since some time as I work on the EFLpp > wrapper. Why are simple C types typedefed like Evas_Coord. This is > really confusing. Why not simply using an int?
It is the data type defined in the library. I don't know why there is such a type instead of a simple int. I am sure the developers have a reasonable answer. > > Second question: Why have several EFL libs an own BOOL type. I think > there's a bool in stdbool.h. And if there're some platform which don't > support then, EFL should define a bool type instead of BOOL. Autoconf > could easy do this. Is this only for historical reasons? > > regards > Andreas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Oğuz Yarımtepe www.loopbacking.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
