On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > hey, > > about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to free > l->data while l is not available anymore. > > so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 : free first l->data, then > remove the list item l. > > what do you think ?
it is still wrong since l->next will be accessed right after that. You need to move E_FREE() call before list removal and use proper iteration, might be good use of my EINA_LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(). -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
