Hi,
> this pretty much tells the problem. the ONLY test it seems to properly > accelerate is the textblock intl test. unless something drastic went wrong > here, but those numbers are very low for accelerated rendering on any > device - > that smells like software. very bad software too. > > try software_x11 or fb egnine of evas to compare with "pure software": > > expedite -e x11 > expedite -e fb > > I tried with expedite -e fb and got better results. I didn't enable x11 related options while compiling thats why i only tried with fb. Here are some results. 3.35 , Image Blend Unscaled 5.49 , Image Data ARGB Alpha 25.00 , Image Blend Solid Unscaled 2.00 , Rect Blend 7.61 , Image Crossfade So the same results are slower when ran with DirectFB engine. When you said "very bad software" you meaned the DirectFB libraries are bad or something else? I may recompile after i installed a new version of DirectFB. -- Oğuz Yarımtepe www.loopbacking.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
