Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Viktor Kojouharov > <vkojouha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 02:16 +0200, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" wrote: >>> Do you have any idea why is this not working as expected? >>> >> Not really related to the problem at hand, but if you are really looking >> into creating such a client, it might be better if you base it on >> telepathy, rather than libpurple > > in theory yes, but practice no. Telepathy is all nice and dbus and > designed for that, but seems nobody is using it for real these days > (nokia devices try to do, but nobody I know use telepathy there, > rather install pidgin. even with a much worse ui!). So you have a lib > used by pidgin, the most used (?) im on linux, the base of some > web-apps like meebo and so on, so it's tested and it usually works > well.
Yes, that's it. And also if there are some transport protocols available for Telepathy they're really not at the level of what libpurple allows to do (while telepathy-haze - that should allow to use the libpurple protocols with telepathy - doesn't seem to be enough yet). Plus, in my idea, I'd like to implement a client for embedded devices and if i can avoid to use wrappers (and dbus), I guess that I could get better performances and less resource usage. So I hope you'd agree with me that we should find the way to make ecore work with libpurple (as other gui toolkits - like cocoa for Mac OS X - allows to do). I hope someone will help me! :P -- Treviño's World - Life and Linux http://www.3v1n0.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
