On Saturday 02 May 2009 22:08:27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:15 PM, pieterg <piet...@gmx.com> wrote: > > On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:26:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM, pieterg <piet...@gmx.com> wrote: > >> > How about if we allow the use of "group:signal" as signal name? > >> > I've implemented this as a test, and it works like expected. > >> > >> I don't know if it would break things, possibly you better do check if > >> there is a part with that id and it is GROUP in order to avoid > >> breaking existing apps that may use ":" in the name. > > > > OK, good point. So something like this perhaps? > > mostly. I liked your patch, but committed a slightly different version > that does only one strchr() and uses strdupa() instead of strdup() as > strings live for short time and are rather small. > > I also changed it to use the part name, not the source name as usually > you can have more than one part using the same group/source. See > attached example.
Indeed, I was in doubt about whether to use the part name or the source name, changed it to the source name the last minute. But in order to allow the same group to be swallowed several times, we need to use the part name, as you say. Thanks for committing this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
