On Wednesday, 10 June 2009, at 14:06:52 (+0200), Cedric BAIL wrote: > > "Static linking of applications to the XYZ library does not constitute a > > derivative work and does not require the author to provide source code > > for the application, use the shared XYZ libraries, or link their > > applications against a user-supplied version of library XYZ." > > I would like to state that this is only relevant for system without > dynamic linking and it make sense in my opinion. So what do people > think of : > > "Static linking of applications to eina library does not constitute a > derivative work on system that does not provide dynamic linking and > does not require the author to provide source code for the > application, use the shared eina libraries or link their applications > against a user-supplied version of library eina".
The originally-suggested text says the same thing and is grammatically correct. It's probably unwise to have grammatically dubious text in a legal statement. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[email protected]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Act like you expect to get into the end zone." -- Joe Paterno ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
