On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:12:57 +0200, Michael Jennings <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 August 2009, at 23:06:41 (+0200), > Kim Woelders wrote: > >> This reverts a "fix" made May 14 2008. >> >> I don't think either are correct and I suggest this in stead: > > Yeah, neither is correct. I just am not sure what the right answer > is. > >> The data are Atoms so the format must be 32 and the data type must be >> long. > > But long on 64-bit platforms is 64-bit. So shouldn't the "32" be > "sizeof(long)" instead? > No. The "wire" item size is 32 bit. /Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
