On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:36:28AM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote : >> >> Twas brillig at 22:30:44 03.09.2009 UTC+02 when [email protected] did gyre >> and gimble: >> >> VT> Looks good to me. I've looked at others .og files (in fontconfig >> VT> for example), and I have seen a Libs.private. SHould it be used ? >> >> Yes, of course! >> >> The rule of thumb is "when something is not needed to link with a shared >> library, it goes to {Requires,Libs}.private" > > As far as the EFL are concerned Requires.private can replace Requires > virtually > everywhere, however this is not true /at all/ for Libs. > > In fact, most of what's in Libs currently shouldn't move to Libs.private, > because they actually are justified. are you sure ? http://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/pkg-config-guide.html shouln't -liconv be in Libs.private ? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
